Trump pressar Japan till handelssamtal
USA hotar med att införa tullar på japanska bilar om inte förhandlingar om ett bilateralt handelsavtal inleds, skriver FT.
Relationen mellan USA och Japan har varit ansträngd sedan USA lämnade frihandelsavtalet TPP tidigare i år. Även om det upptrappade handelskriget med Kina och Nafta-förhandlingarna med Kanada står i fokus blir handelssamtalen med Japan en allt viktigare fråga för Donald Trump, skriver tidningen.
– Biltullarna är ett trubbigt men effektivt verktyg. Japan måste ta dem seriöst, säger Tobias Harris, Japan-expert på Teneo Intelligence till FT.
Så sent som i går slöt USA ett nytt handelsavtal med Sydkorea.
bakgrund
TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership)
Wikipedia (en)
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a defunct proposed trade agreement between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, and United States signed on 4 February 2016, which was not ratified as required and did not take effect. After the United States withdrew its signature, the agreement could not enter into force. The remaining nations negotiated a new trade agreement called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which incorporates most of the provisions of the TPP.
The TPP began as an expansion of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP or P4) signed by Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore in 2005. Beginning in 2008, additional countries joined the discussion for a broader agreement: Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States, and Vietnam, bringing the negotiating countries to twelve. In January 2017, the United States withdrew from the agreement. The other 11 TPP countries agreed in May 2017 to revive it and reached agreement in January 2018. In March 2018, the 11 countries signed the revised version of the agreement, called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.The original TPP contained measures to lower both non-tariff and tariff barriers to trade, and establish an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The U.S. International Trade Commission, the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the World Bank and the Office of the Chief Economist at Global Affairs Canada found the final agreement would, if ratified, lead to net positive economic outcomes for all signatories, while an analysis using an unorthodox model by two Tufts University economists found the agreement would adversely affect the signatories. Many observers have argued the trade deal would have served a geopolitical purpose, namely to reduce the signatories' dependence on Chinese trade and bring the signatories closer to the United States.
Tidigare
Omni är politiskt obundna och oberoende. Vi strävar efter att ge fler perspektiv på nyheterna. Har du frågor eller synpunkter kring vår rapportering? Kontakta redaktionen